Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73266 (ALL)

PRAKASH VEER v. THE STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9397/2025 · 2025-07-10

Ajit Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111334 Court No. - 4 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9397 of 2025 Petitioner :- Prakash Veer Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ambuj Maurya,Anura Singh,Atipriya Gautam,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Ajit Kumar,J. 1. Heard Ms. Anura Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution petitioner has prayed for quashing of the transfer order dated 15.06.2025 for it being in violation of the transfer policy. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner wants to stay back at Ghaziabad for medical reasons as his father is ailing one and is undergoing treatment at Ghaziabad. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the contrary submits that since the petitioner has stayed for long at Ghaziabad he deserved to be transferred. 5. In the given facts and circumstances this petition stands disposed of with direction to the petitioner to move fresh representation in this regard before the respondent concerned within a period of two weeks from today and in the event any such representation is made the respondent concerned is directed to consider and dispose of the same strictly in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks by means of a reasoned and speaking order. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Nadeem Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad