APHC010073242020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4626/2020 Between: 1. SAKSHALA PULLAIAH,, S/O.BAYYANNA, AGED ABOUT. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE WORKER, R/O.ANANTHAGIRI VILLAGE, GUDEM CHERUVU POST, JAMMALAMADUGU MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(HOME) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT AT POLICE. 3. THE SHO, JAMMALAMADUGU URBAN POLICE, KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. SMT PUTTA JAYANTHI, W/O.SANJEEVARAYUDU, AGED ABOUT. 55 YEARS, 0CC. HOUSE-WIFE, R/O.D.NO.1/221-4, CHINNACHOWK, KADAPA TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. ANITHA, D/O.JAYANTHI, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1/221-4, CHINNACHOWK, KADPA TOWN, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.2 and 3 couldn't register FIR as per complaint DT.22-01- 2020 against the respondents No.4 and 5 as arbitrary, illegal against Art.19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NAGARAJU NAGURU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2 The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents No.2 and 3 couldn't register FIR as per complaint DT.22-01- 2020 against the respondents No.4 and 5 as arbitrary, illegal against Art.19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders and to pass ...” Heard learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent State. Perused the material on record. None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home placed on record the written instructions and would submit that basing on the complaint given by the Petitioner in SPANDANA programme and during enquiry it was revealed that the subject matter is purely family dispute and no case was registered against the Petitioner and no orders are necessary in this Writ Petition. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 4626 of 2020 12.09.2025 Mjl /*