MINAL W/O PRAKASH MISHRA v. SHARAD S/O GOWARDHAN BRAMHNE
WP/8088/2022 · 2025-11-07
Shri Rohit Wasudeo Joshi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73246 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73246 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
8.wp.8088.22 1/1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Writ Petition No.8088 of 2022 Minal w/o Prakash Mishra vs. Sharad s/o Gowardhan Bramhne =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Mr. A.A. Dhawas, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. N.R. Bhishikar, Advocate for the Respondent. CORAM : ROHIT W. JOSHI, J. DATE : 7 th NOVEMBER, 2025.
The learned Advocate for the petitioner states that the possession of the suit property is handed over to the respondent in terms of the concurrent decrees for eviction passed by the learned Courts. He makes a states, on instructions from the petitioner, that the petitioner does not desire to prosecute the petition.
02. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn.
JUDGE *sandesh 2025:BHC-NAG:11685