Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73242 (KAR)

KUM. ASHWINI. S. T. v. DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT

WP/27576/2025 · 2025-09-10

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35681 WP No. 27576 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 27576 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: KUM. ASHWINI. S. T. D/O TIMMEGOWDA C/O JAWAEWGOWDA AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS R/AT SALUKOPPALU VILLAGE MUNDURU POST, SALIGRAMA HOBLI KR NAGARA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 602 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANIKANTA H B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT GATE NO.3, 1ST FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI BANGALORE-560 001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. DEPUTY DIRECTOR DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT 1ST FLOOR, STHRI SHAKTHI BHAVANA KRISHNADEVARAYA VRUTHA VIJAYANAGARA, MYSURU-570 017. 3. THE CHILD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER AND MEMBER SECRETARY TALUK LEVEL APPLICATION SCRUTINY COMMITTEE KR NAGARA, KR NAGARA TALUK MYSURU-571 602 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SIDHARTH BABU RAO, AGA FOR RESPONDENTS) Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:35681 WP No. 27576 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH TEMPORARY SELECTION LIST FOR K R NAGARA TALUK, SALUKOPPALU VILLAGE ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE –C AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has called in question the provisional selection list for the post of Anganawadi Worker, K.R.Nagar Taluk, issued by respondent No.3 as per Annexure-C. 2. The petitioner has filed objections to the said provisional selection list. Since the final selection list has not yet been issued, this writ petition filed by the petitioner is considered as premature at this stage. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the final selection list, she is at liberty to challenge the same in accordance with law. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM, LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 15