HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22391 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Pursuant to the earlier order, instructions have come up which are taken on record. 2. According to the instructions so received, it transpires that that the petitioner is bhumidhar with non-transferable right and the land recorded under Section 132 of the U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, over which, no bhumidhari right would accrue in favour of any party. Moreover, the instructions reveals that proceedings under Section 128 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, is pending consideration. The instructions also reveals that no drain is being dug out on the said land. 3. In view of the said instructions, there is no need to issue any mandamus restraining the respondents to stop digging as the authority themselves had stated in the instructions that no drain is being dug out at the site in questions. 4. In view of the said fact, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 15, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alka, Rakesh Kumar Rathore, Rekha Sahu Counsel for Respondent(s) : Avinash Chandra Srivastava, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Udai Veer Singh And 10 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad