Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7321 (PNJ)

HARYANA WAQF BOARD v. CHIRAG DAWAR AND OTHERS

CR/8380/2025 · 2026-05-25

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-8380-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 314 Haryana Waqf Board Chirag Dawar and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. taken on record. 2. of India has been filed respondents from raising nature of suit property the suit filed by the petitioner Rohtak, on account of the fact that the functioning at Rohtak. 3. that vide Notification Dated 09.04.2026 issued by the Government of Haryana, Administration of Justice Department, stands constituted at Karnal any application for g CPC shall be moved before the Waqf Tribunal 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-8380 Date of Decision: Haryana Waqf Board Versus Chirag Dawar and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. GN Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satyam Aneja, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 3. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 3 is taken on record. The present revision petition under Article 227 Constitution has been filed by the petitioner ts from raising/dismantling construction of suit property; and sub-letting the the suit filed by the petitioner/plaintiff before the on account of the fact that the learned functioning at Rohtak. At the very outset, learned counse vide Notification Dated 09.04.2026 issued by the Government of Haryana, Administration of Justice Department, stands constituted at Karnal and suit property is at Panipat any application for grant of relief under Order XXXIX shall be moved before the Waqf Tribunal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 8380-2025 Date of Decision: 25.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. GN Malik, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Satyam Aneja, Advocate for respondents No. 1 and 3. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents No. 1 and 3 is under Article 227 Constitution by the petitioner-plaintiff for restraining the construction and changing the letting the same during the pendency of before the learned Waqf Tribunal, learned Waqf Tribunal is not At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties submit vide Notification Dated 09.04.2026 issued by the Government of Haryana, Administration of Justice Department, the Waqf Tribunal now and suit property is at Panipat. Therefore, rant of relief under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 shall be moved before the Waqf Tribunal, Karnal. RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-8380-2025 4. is taken on record. 5. is of the year 2025; and 2 CPC had already been moved by the petitioner/plaintiff before the learned Waqf Tribunal along with the suit. be issued to the learned Waqf 6. length and keeping in view the afore disposed of Waqf Tribunal, Karnal, shall consider and decide the application under XXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, if any, moved by the petitioner expeditiously. 7. 25.05.2026 rishu 2025 -2- Copy of notification dated 09.04.2026 handed over in Court is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner is of the year 2025; and an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and had already been moved by the petitioner/plaintiff before the learned Waqf Tribunal along with the suit. be issued to the learned Waqf Tribunal to decide the same expeditiously. Having heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable length and keeping in view the afore-noted facts, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. f Tribunal, Karnal, shall consider and decide the application under XXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, if any, moved by the petitioner expeditiously. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable 09.04.2026 handed over in Court counsel for the petitioner submits that the civil suit application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and had already been moved by the petitioner/plaintiff before the learned Waqf Tribunal along with the suit. It is prayed that a direction Tribunal to decide the same expeditiously. Having heard learned counsel for the parties at considerable noted facts, the present petition is infructuous. However, the learned f Tribunal, Karnal, shall consider and decide the application under XXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC, if any, moved by the petitioner, Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.