Govind Kutty And Anr v. The State Of Jharkhand And Anr
Cr.M.P./1536/2016 · 2025-06-30
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7320 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7320 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:17177] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr.M.P. No.1536 of 2016
------
1. Govind Kutty son of Gopal Nayar
2. Sumathi wife of Gobind Kutty
Both are residents of village Kandangali Payanoor, P.O. and P.S. Payamnad, District Kanoor (Kerla) … Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. T. P. Mustaffa son of K. Abdullah, Resident of Fatima Manjil, Kunjimanglam, P.O. Kunjumanglam, P.O. and Police Station Paiyanur, District Kanoor, (Kerala)
… Opposite Parties
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : None For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Abdul Wahab, Advocate
------
Order No:-10 Dated:-30-06-2025
Heard the learned P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2.
No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls.
Learned P.P. appearing for the State and the learned counsel for the opposite party No.2 jointly submit that since there is no merit in this Cr.M.P., hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this Cr.M.P.
Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/