Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No.4013 of 2025 Nilamani Sethi ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Suraj Mohanty -versus- State Of Odisha(vig.) ..... Opp. Party Represented By Adv. – N. Maharana, Standing Counsel for the Vigilance Dept. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 16.10.2025 Order No. I.A. No.2965 of 2025 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. This I.A. has been filed with a prayer for modification of order dated 26.09.2025. 3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner contended that since the word “remitted back” has not been indicated in the order, the trial court is finding it difficult to consider the application pursuant to the direction contained in the order dated 26.09.2025. 4. On a careful analysis of order dated 26.09.2025, this Court is of the view that no correction is necessary and the learned trial court shall proceed strictly in accordance with the direction Page 2 of 2. contained in para-5 of the order dated 26.09.2025. 5. Accordingly, the I.A. stands disposed of. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil Designation: Junior Stenographer