Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73191 (PAT)

Binita Devi v. The State of Bihar

MJC/2690/2023 · 2025-05-06

Anil Kumar Sinha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2690 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1922 of 2023 ====================================================== Binita Devi W/O Anil Prasad Yadav R/o Vill.- Baldiha, P.S.- Amnor, Dist- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar Through the principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Bailey Road Patna. 2. The Director, Department of Social welfare, Government of Bihar, Bailey Road Patna. 3. The Deputy Director, Department of Social welfare, Patna, Dist.-Patna 4. The Additional Chief secretary of social welfare department, Patna, Dist- Patna 5. The Commissioner Saran at Chapra, Dist.- Saran 6. The District Magistrate Saran at Chapra, Dist.- Saran 7. The District Program Officer Saran at Chapra, Dist.- Saran. 8. The Child Development Project Officer Amnor, Dist.-Saran. 9. Umrawati Devi W/O Birendra Singh (F), R/O vill- Baldiha P.S. Amnor district-Saran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 3 06-05-2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertent mistake the requisites for issuance of notice vide order dated 12.07.2023, was not filed within the peremptory time but the same was filed on 11.09.2023. 2. Considering the submission, this restoration application is allowed. C.W.J.C. No. No. 1922 of 2023, is restored to its original file and the time granted by this Court for Patna High Court MJC No.2690 of 2023(3) dt.06-05-2025 2/2 furnishing the requisites for notice is extended till the period it was filed by the petitioner. 3. The Office is directed to take steps for issuance of notice to respondent no. 9. aditya/- (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) U