COCP-5362 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 104 Subhash @ Subhash Chander Sh. Mohammed Shayin and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. violation of order dated Court in CWP others’ whereby benefit of regularization of service to the petitioner w.e.f. the date when his immediate junior was regularized within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order; and benefits shall further period of 03 months and the same shall be released to the petitioner within a period of 02 months thereafter. 2. submits that that due compliance of the Writ Court order dated 21.01.2025 (Annexure C 08.05.2026 (Annexure R this effect. As such, nothing 5362-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP Date of Decision: Subhash @ Subhash Chander Versus Sh. Mohammed Shayin and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Mohit Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petition has been filed violation of order dated 21.01.2025 (Annexure CWP-23545-2021, titled as ‘Subhash whereby the respondent-Department was directed to extend the benefit of regularization of service to the petitioner w.e.f. the date when his immediate junior was regularized within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order; and benefits shall also be calculated by the respondent further period of 03 months and the same shall be released to the petitioner within a period of 02 months thereafter. At the very outset, learned counsel for th submits that that due compliance of the Writ Court order dated 21.01.2025 (Annexure C-1) has been effected; and even an affidavit dated 08.05.2026 (Annexure R-2) has also been submitted by the petitioner to this effect. As such, nothing survives in the present petition. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5362-2025 Date of Decision: 26.05.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Mohit Rathee, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Naveen Kumar, Addl. A.G., Haryana. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging (Annexure C-1) passed by the Writ Subhash vs. State of Haryana and Department was directed to extend the benefit of regularization of service to the petitioner w.e.f. the date when his immediate junior was regularized within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order; and the consequential be calculated by the respondent-Department within a further period of 03 months and the same shall be released to the petitioner within a period of 02 months thereafter. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent-State submits that that due compliance of the Writ Court order dated effected; and even an affidavit dated ) has also been submitted by the petitioner to survives in the present petition. alleging the Writ and Department was directed to extend the benefit of regularization of service to the petitioner w.e.f. the date when his immediate junior was regularized within a period of 03 months from the consequential Department within a further period of 03 months and the same shall be released to the State submits that that due compliance of the Writ Court order dated effected; and even an affidavit dated ) has also been submitted by the petitioner to RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-5362 3. aforesaid submissions of learned co Learned counsel submits on the consequenti para 6 of the affidavit dated 08.02.2026 (Annexure R the petitioner respondent as follows: 4. 5. required to be passed in the present petition of, accordingly. 6. 7. 26.05.2026 rishu 5362-2025 -2- Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the aforesaid submissions of learned counsel for the respondent Learned counsel submits that interest is liable to be paid to the petitioner on the consequential benefits now released to the petitioner. However, in para 6 of the affidavit dated 08.02.2026 (Annexure R the petitioner, he had submitted that nothing survives against the respondent-Department. Para No. 6 of the affidavit (Annexure as follows:- “6. That I am fully satisfied with the complaint made by the respondent-Department in pursuance of the judgment/order passed by this Hon’ble Court and no further grievance or claim now survives against the respondent department in relation to the subject matter of the present petition.” Heard. In view of the facts noted required to be passed in the present petition accordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 26.05.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the unsel for the respondent-State. that interest is liable to be paid to the petitioner al benefits now released to the petitioner. However, in para 6 of the affidavit dated 08.02.2026 (Annexure R-2) duly sworn-in by submitted that nothing survives against the Para No. 6 of the affidavit (Annexure R-2), reads That I am fully satisfied with the complaint made by Department in pursuance of the judgment/order passed by this Hon’ble Court and no further grievance or claim now survives against the respondent- relation to the subject matter of the present above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition; and the same stands disposed Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No Learned counsel for the petitioner has not disputed the State. that interest is liable to be paid to the petitioner al benefits now released to the petitioner. However, in in by submitted that nothing survives against the 2), reads That I am fully satisfied with the complaint made by Department in pursuance of the judgment/order passed by this Hon’ble Court and no further relation to the subject matter of the present above, no further orders are disposed RISHU KATARIA 2026.05.29 16:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.