Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73172 (PAT)

Sangeeta Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./62110/2025 · 2025-08-29

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62110 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2024 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Sangeeta Devi W/o Narendra Chandravanshi R/o Village - Karkat Bigaha, P.S - Paliganj, District - Patna 2. Sonu Kumar S/o Narendra Chandarbanshi R/o Village - Karkat Bigaha, P.S - Paliganj, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Ujjawal Bhushan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 29-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126, 115(2), 118, 109, 103, 352 and 351(3) of the BNS, 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.1 is a woman and the informant alleges that Rajesh Chandarbanshi assaulted the nephew of the informant by Patra causing injury on head, while Raju Chandarbanshi assaulted Nitu by lathi causing injury on head, thereafter Ravi along with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62110 of 2025(2) dt.29-08-2025 2/3 petitioner no. 1 assaulted the bhabhi of the informant Daulti Devi by lathi causing injury on head. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the entire family members have been implicated. It is next submitted that no doubt against Nagender Chandarbanshi and Narendra Chandarbanshi are alleged to have assaulted the father of the informant by Khanti leading to his death, but then as far as instant petitioners are concerned, against petitioner no.1 it is alleged that she dashed the sister of the informant on ground by holding her hair and no specific allegation of assault is alleged against petitioner no.2 but then he has been implicated in the instant case merely for the reason that he is son of Nagendra Chandarbanshi. It is further submitted that Mukesh Kumar along with two others had moved this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Criminal Miscellaneous No. 40790 of 2025 and the same was allowed by an order dated 22.08.2025. It is submitted that the case of the petitioners are on a better footing. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62110 of 2025(2) dt.29-08-2025 3/3 event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 455 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. amit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T