Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CCP(D) No. 07/2020
Sr. No.17 Suppl. List.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(D) No. 07/2020
Ms. Shaheena. …Applicant(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Lone Altaf, Advocate Vs. Mr. Manoj Kumar Dewidi. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jehingeer Dar, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHD YOUSUF WANI, JUDGE
O R D E R 01.01.2025
1. This Court vide order dated 11th May 2020, directed the appellants in LPAOW No. 47/2018, to consider the family member of the writ petitioner for compassionate appointment in terms of SRO-43 of 1994, and simultaneously, the appellants therein were also directed to ensure the payment of Rs. 1,00,000/- to the writ petitioner in terms of
order dated 1st April, 2003 by the J&K State Human Rights Commission along with simple interest @ 8% per annum.
2. The respondent has filed the compliance report, stating therein that an amount of Rs. 2,28,000/- i.e. Rs. 1,00,000/- as ex-gratia relief, plus 8% interest per annum for a period of sixteen years stands already deposited before this Court and further the District Level Screening- cum Coordination Committee on 4th April, 2022, cleared the case for cash compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/- only in lieu of employment as
directed by this Court vide order dated 11th May, 2020. Abdul Rashid Ganaie I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
CCP(D) No. 07/2020
3. The petitioner died during the pendency of this contempt petition and she was substituted by her daughter and son namely Mst. Shaheena and Bashir Ahmad Mir respectively, and thereafter an amount of Rs. 100,000/- ex-gratia relief along with interest stood released in favour of both son and daughter of the deceased-petitioner.
4. On the previous date of hearing, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner was directed to ensure the presence of Bashir Ahmad Mir before this Court. The said Bashir Ahmad Mir has appeared before this Court today and his statement has been recorded wherein he has stated that he has no objection, if the amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- granted under SRO-43 of 1994 as cash compensation in lieu of employment is released in favour of his sister namely Mst. Shaheena.
5. In view of above, the instant contempt petition is closed with a direction to the Registry to release the amount of Rs. 4,00,000/- alongwith interest accrued, if any, in favour of the petitioner namely Shaheena after her due identification by the counsel representing her.
(MOHD YOUSUF WANI) (RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR: 01.01.2025
“Abdul Rashid”
Abdul Rashid Ganaie I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document