207-4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CWP-8360-2016 Date of Decision: 24.07.2025 Vijay Puri ...Petitioner Vs. Chandigarh Housing Board and Others ...Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Rajinder Kumar Singla, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parveen Chauhan, Advocate for Mr. Gagandeep Singh Wasu, Advocate for the respondent-Chandigarh Housing Board. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 31.03.2016 whereby he was ordered to retire at the age of 54 years. 2. Mr. Rajinder Kumar Singla, Advocate submits that as per his information, petitioner has passed away. 3. The impugned order was passed on 31.03.2016. A period of more than nine years has passed away. The petitioner has expired. In aforestated circumstances, the instant petition has rendered infructuous. 4. Disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 24.07.2025 Prince Chawla Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No PRINCE CHAWLA 2025.07.25 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document