SMT NAMRATA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/21874/2025 · 2025-07-17
Saurabh Srivastava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73155 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73155 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:117519 Court No. - 77 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21874 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Namrata And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Kumar Verma,Chandrawati Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
2. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought.
3. It is the case of the petitioners that they have already solemnized marriage on dated 26.06.2025 in Arya Samaj Temple and they have also applied online on dated 29.06.2025 seeking registration of their marriage and for that they are being threatened and harassed by respondent no.4 with the collusion of local police.
Learned counsel for petitioners further submitted that in pursuance of the hindrances being created by respondent no.4, petitioners moved a representation/complaint on dated 30.06.2025 before respondent no.2/Police Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar Commissionerate, Prayagraj, but no heed has been paid, hence this petition.
4. Considering the threat perception and circumstances as demonstrated through application dated 30.06.2025, respondent no.2/Police Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar Commissionerate, Prayagraj is hereby directed to provide a mobile number to both the petitioners which may be received by an officer not below the rank of Sub-Inspector of Uttar Pradesh Police, so that in case of any urgency or emergency, the same may be dialed by either of the petitioners for apprising any urgency or emergency arises for calling that officer.
5. Specific instructions be issued to officer concerned deputed by respondent no.2/Police Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar Commissionerate, Prayagraj to respond the call as and when made by either of the petitioners by way of taking all measures for
protecting and safeguarding their liberty from any anti-social elements or other family members of either of the petitioners.
6. The above mentioned system shall be operative only for next three months and thereafter assessing the circumstances and security threat, if available, the decision will be taken by respondent no.2/Police Commissioner, Yamuna Nagar Commissionerate, Prayagraj either to extend the same or to stop and the same shall be intimated to the petitioners.
7. The writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 18.7.2025 Saif Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad