Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:5626-DB SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSB 253/2021
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
None appears for the petitioner.
Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder, for the State.
Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate, for the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission.
(2) Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records and quashing Clause 2(J) of the advertisement dated 02.07.2020 issued by the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission (Annexure No. 7 to the Writ Petition), to the extent it requires that the OBC caste Certificate should not be more than one year old from the last date of submission of online application Form i.e. 25th August 2017, in as much as the said condition is in violation of the provisions of the Government
Order dated 26th February 2016.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the respondent Uttarakhand Public Service Commission to treat the OBC Caste Certificate issued in favour of the Petitioner by the Tehsildar, Kashipur District Udham Singh Nagar as valid in terms of the Government
Order dated 26th February 2016, for selection on the post of Assistant Professor (Education), pursuant to the advertisement dated 04th August 2017.”
(3) Mr. Ashish Joshi,
learned Counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, has drawn attention
2025:UHC:5626-DB to averment made in para 9 of the counter affidavit, filed by Secretary, Uttarakhand Public Service Commission, wherein it is stated that petitioner participated in interview, held on 14.7.2021, however he was not selected, based on his performance in interview. It is further stated that the selection process has concluded and, therefore, writ petition has become infructuous.
(4) Since the Commission permitted the petitioner to participate in the selection process and after being declared unsuccessful in the selection, based on his performance in the interview, the relief as sought in the writ petition do not survive. Thus the writ petition fails and is dismissed.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
2.7.2025 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d 462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA5 8C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.07.03 10:05:45 +05'30'
2025:UHC:5626-DB