Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7315 (PNJ)

SONIA v. VIRENDER KUMAR

TA/179/2026 · 2026-05-25

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 118 Sonia Varinder Kumar CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Mr.Gautam Kaile Advocate through e Registry on mandatory for learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish hard the petition in the Registry within one month, as per decision of the Hon’ble Computer Committee dated 28.05.2025, duly ap Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 31.05.2025. However, till date, learned counsel has not furnished the hard copy of the petition. Application bearing No. TA filed, which, vide order dated 08.4.2026 passed by a co has been allowed. the case having been called twice. dismissed, decision of the Hon’ble Committee dated 28.05.2025. May 25, 202 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Transfer Application No.179 of 2026 (O & M) Date of decision :-25.05 Versus Varinder Kumar CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Office note perused. The present Transfer Appli am Kaile Advocate through e-filing which was approved by the Registry on 16.7.2025. As per office note, after such approval, it is mandatory for learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish hard the petition in the Registry within one month, as per decision of the Hon’ble Computer Committee dated 28.05.2025, duly ap Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 31.05.2025. However, till date, learned counsel has not furnished the hard copy of the petition. It has further been reported that another Transfer Application bearing No. TA-915/2025 on the same cause of action was filed, which, vide order dated 08.4.2026 passed by a co has been allowed. There is no representation on behalf of the applicant, despite the case having been called twice. In view of the facts noted above, the Transfer Application is smissed, being duplicate petition as well as for non decision of the Hon’ble Committee dated 28.05.2025. , 2026 Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Transfer Application No.179 of 2026 (O & M) .05.2026 …..Applicant …..Respondent HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA The present Transfer Application has been filed by filing which was approved by the . As per office note, after such approval, it is mandatory for learned counsel for the petitioner to furnish hard-copy of the petition in the Registry within one month, as per decision of the Hon’ble Computer Committee dated 28.05.2025, duly approved by Hon’ble the Chief Justice on 31.05.2025. However, till date, learned counsel has not furnished the hard copy of the petition. It has further been reported that another Transfer 915/2025 on the same cause of action was filed, which, vide order dated 08.4.2026 passed by a co-ordinate Bench, There is no representation on behalf of the applicant, despite In view of the facts noted above, the Transfer Application is being duplicate petition as well as for non-compliance of decision of the Hon’ble Committee dated 28.05.2025. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.05.25 21.01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document