Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73148 (KAR)

M/S INNMAR TOURISM AND HOTELS PVT LTD v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/4851/2024 · 2025-08-13

M I Arun

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31443 WP No. 4851 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.4851 OF 2024 (LB-TAX) BETWEEN: 1. M/S. INNMAR TOURISM & HOTELS PVT. LTD. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF INDIA COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: NO.134, 135 AND 136 (P) ROAD NO.1, EPIP AREA ITPL ROAD, WHITEFIELD BANGALORE - 560 066 BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. LAKSHMI S. HOLLA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY DEPT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT 4TH FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE - 560 001. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31443 WP No. 4851 of 2024 2. BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BY ITS COMMISSIONER N R SQUARE, BANGALORE-560 002. 3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE MAHADEVAPURA ZONE BENGALURU - 560 049. 4. THE ASST. REVENUE OFFICER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGAR PALIKE MARATHAHALLI RANGE MAHADEVAPURA ZONE BENGALURU - 560 048. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA FOR R.1; SRI S.H. PRASHANTH, ADVOCATE FOR R.2 TO R.4.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTIFICATION BEARING NUMBER COMMR./BBMP- DC(REV)/5675/15-16 DATED. 09.03.2016 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AS AT ANNEXURE-D, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31443 WP No. 4851 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 30.07.2025 with a prayer to dismiss the writ petition as withdrawn. 2. The memo is taken on record. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE VMB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 48