Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73146 (ALL)

SURYA PRATAP SINGH v. State of UP

BAIL/36125/2024 · 2025-04-29

Siddharth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:67928 Court No. - 47 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36125 of 2024 Applicant :- Surya Pratap Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- A Kumar Srivastava,Ajay Kumar Sinha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddharth,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. There are allegations against the applicant of causing murder of daughter of informant along with his father and mother. Counsel for the applicant submits that it has come in the statement of sister of informant recorded before the trial court as P.W.-2 that the deceased and her father had gone to the house of informant to lookafter his house when the applicant had gone to city. The alleged incident took place in the absence of applicant and other co-accused, in their home. Counsel for the applicant also submits that co-accused, Devendra Nath Singh and Sunita Singh, have already been enlarged on bail vide Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 25049 of 2024 and 11714 of 2024. He is in jail since 20.01.2024 and has criminal history of one case to his credit. On the other hand learned A.G.A has opposed the prayer for bail. Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Manish Sisodia vs. Directorate of Enforcement, 2024 LawSuit (SC) 677 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. Let the applicant, Surya Pratap Singh, involved in Case Crime No. 12 of 2024, under Sections- 302/34 of IPC and Section 3/25 of Arms Act, P.S.- Dokati, District- Ballia, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses. (ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code. (iv) In case the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code. (v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Order Date :- 30.4.2025 Rohit Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad