Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010028032025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/535/2025 SMTI GEETA BARMAN WIFE OF LATE SUTKU BARMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- PADMABIL P.O- GOSSAIGAON P.S-GOSSAIGAON DIST-KOKRAJHAR, ASSAM. PIN- 783361 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ASSAM SACHIBALAYA, DISPUR. GUWAHATI-6 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3. 4:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT KOKRAJHAR RURAL ROADS DIVISION P.O. KOKRAJHAR PIN - 783361 DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 5:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT GOSSAIGAON ROADS SUB-DIVISION Page No.# 2/3 P.O. GOSSAIGAON PIN- 783361 DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM 6:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI - 781006. 7:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL Aand E MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-781029 ASSAM For the applicant : Mr. S. Das, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. D. Nath, S.C., PWD For respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 Ms. R.B. Bora, Jr. Govt. Advocate, Assam For respondent No.2 Mr. P. Nayak, Addl. A.G., Assam For respondent No.6 Mr. C. Boruah, S.C., A.G. For respondent No.7 – B E F O R E – HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIJAY BISHNOI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR 23-04-2025 (Vijay Bishnoi, C.J.) The matter comes up for consideration of IA(Civil) No.535/2025 filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 with the prayer for condonation of delay of 142 days in filing the connected writ appeal. Page No.# 3/3 Mr. D. Nath, learned Standing Counsel, PWD is appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1, 3, 4 and 5; Ms. R.B. Bora, Junior Government Advocate, Assam is appearing on behalf of respondent No.2; Mr. P. Nayak, learned Additional Advocate General, Assam is appearing on behalf of the respondent No.6; and Mr. C. Boruah, learned Standing Counsel, Accountant General, is appearing on behalf of the respondent No.7. Service is, therefore, complete. Learned counsel for the respondents have not seriously opposed the condonation application. In view of the above and having gone through the contents of the application, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay in filing the connected writ appeal. Accordingly, the delay of 142 days in filing the connected writ appeal is condoned. The interlocutory application is disposed of. Registry is directed to register the connected writ appeal and list the same for admission after 4 (four) weeks. JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Comparing Assistant