Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7313 (GAU)

DAL PATHAK v. DR. PRAKASH SHARMA

Cont.Cas(C)/804/2015 · 2025-10-16

Robin Phukan

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010027712015 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/804/2015 DAL PATHAK S/O- LT. HARIRAM PATHAK, R/O- GANDHINAGAR, P.O. and DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM. VERSUS DR. PRAKASH SHARMA PRINCIPAL, M.C. COLLEGE, P.O. and DIST.- BARPETA, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.S K MEDHI, MS.B DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : MR.SHEIKH MUKTAR, MR.H K CHOUDHURY Linked Case : WP(C)/5202/2015 DAL PATHAK S/O LT. HARIRAM PATHAK R/O GANDHINAGAR P.O. BARPETA DIST. BARPETA ASSAM. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA and 8 ORS REP. BY THE SECRETARY TO THE MINISTRY OF DEFENCE WEST BLOCK Page No.# 2/2 IV RK PURAM NEW DLEHI -110066. ------------ Advocate for : MS.B DEKA Advocate for : MS.R DEVI appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA and 8 ORS BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 17.10 .2025 Mr. S.K. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not willing to pursue these matters and as such, the same may be closed with a liberty to approach this Court again by filing appropriate petition. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of Mr. Medhi, learned counsel for the petitioner, both the petition stands closed. However, liberty will remain with the petitioner to approach this Court again by filing appropriate petition. Mr. S. Muktar, learned counsel for the contemnor in Cont.Cas(C) No.804/2015 and also for the respondent Nos.6—8 in WP(C) No.5202/2015 is present. Comparing Assistant Sd/- Robin Phukan JUDGE