HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 3316 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Sri Sanjay Ojha, Advocate holding brief of Ms. Anjali Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist states that he does not wish to press the present criminal revision and, therefore, prays that the same may be dismissed as not pressed. 2. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the revisionist, the present criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed. 3. This order has passed in the presence of Sri Amar Jeet Upadhyay, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA for the State. October 13, 2025 Akbar Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anjali Singh Tomer, Gaurav Singh Tomar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Amar Jeet Upadhyay, G.A. (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Smt Anita Verma And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD AKBAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad