SABITA SARKAR AND ANR v. SANJIT SAHA ALIAS BOB SAHA
CC/74/2024 · 2025-11-18
Amrita Sinha
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73120 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73120 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
OD-1 ORDER SHEET IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION [CONTEMPT] ORIGINAL SIDE
CC/74/2024 Arising out of WPO/1539 /2023 GA/1/2024
SABITA SARKAR & ANR. -VS- SANJIT SAHA ALIAS BOB SAHA
BEFORE THE HON’BLE JUSTICE AMRITA SINHA Date: 18th November, 2025. Appearance : Mr. Indrajit Bhattacharjee, Adv. [VC] ...for Petitioners.
Mr. Gurudas Mitra, Adv. Md. Ziaur Rahman, Adv. ...for KMC.
Mrs. Tapati Samanta, Adv. ...for State.
Mr. Ratul Biswas, Adv. Mr. Ishan Bhattacharya Adv. Ms. Soumoyadipa Kanu, Adv. Mr. Sourajit Mukherjee, Adv. Ms. S. Chatterjee, Adv. ...for Contemnor.
1. Perused the report and the photographs handed over by the learned advocate representing the Corporation wherefrom it appears that the unauthorized construction of the IV storied illegal building has been demolished excepting two rooms in the ground floors occupied by three distressed elderly women.
2. It appears that the direction passed by this Bench stood modified by the Hon’ble Division Bench and the contemnor would be liable to pay Rs.25,00,000/-(rupees twenty-five lakh only) in terms of the order passed by the Hon’ble Division Bench to the petitioners.
3. In line with the law laid down by the Larger Bench of this Court in the matter of Sailesh Kumar Vs. Smitha R., IAS and Anr. reported in 2023 SCC OnLine Calcutta 1152 this Bench is not inclined to proceed
2 with the contempt application any further. The same stands disposed of.
4. It will be open for the petitioners to approach the Hon’ble Division Bench for violation of any direction passed by the said Bench.
5. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, upon compliance of all legal formalities.
(AMRITA SINHA, J.)
nm