IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1568 of 2025 ------ 1. Santosh Sah, aged about 38 years, son of Ramchandra Sah, resident of Guru Nagar, Gangta, Ward No. 20, P.O.- Godda, P.S.-Godda (M), Dist.-Godda, Jharkhand 2. Raj Kumar Yadav, aged about 28 years, son of Hardev Yadav, resident of Village-Gorsanda, Chapri, P.O.-Godda, P.S. -Godda (M), Dist.-Godda, Jharkhand … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 07.03.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No.08 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/115(2)/132/352/351(2)/3(5) of the Indian Penal Code. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention blocked the road by putting the vehicle on the road causing inconvenience to the public and used criminal force against the public servant-District Cooperative Officer deterring him from discharging his duty consequent upon the District Cooperative Officer caught hold of a truck and no document regarding the truck could be produced. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 25 of the anticipatory bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Godda, in connection with Godda (M) P.S. Case No.08 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-