Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73075 (KAR)

M/S MADHU STEEL CORPORATION v. THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BANGALORE

RFA/1502/2006 · 2025-09-10

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37619 RFA No. 1502 of 2006 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1502 OF 2006 BETWEEN: M/S MADHU STEEL CORPORATION FORMERLY AT; NO.5 & 6 MILLIA BUILDING B.OSMAN KHAN ROAD BANGALORE 2 REPBY ITSPROPRIETRIX ROOPAKALA D/O LATE RC DEVA-PAL AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS NOW R/AT #27/1ANNIPURA MAIN ROAD SUDHAMNAGAR,BANGALORE 560 027 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. LAW & LAWS.,ADVOCATE) AND: THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BANGALORE NARASIMHARAJA SQUARE,BANGALORE 2 REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER …RESPONDENT THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:37619 RFA No. 1502 of 2006 ORAL JUDGMENT 1. The Registry has recorded that the case file was handed over to the learned counsel for the appellant for the purpose of complying with the office objections. However, the learned counsel has not returned the file. Despite the best efforts made by the Registry, there has been no response from the learned counsel. Thereafter, the matter has been posted before the Court. 2. Today, when the matter was called out, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21