- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52892 WP No. 18669 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.18669 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: MR. SAGAR N.R S/O LATE NARASIMHA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT NO.198, DR. RAJKUMAR MAIN ROAD, III CROSS, WARD NO.2 VIJAYANAGARA RAMANAGARA TOWN, RAMANGARA - 562 159. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KIRAN N., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION RAMANAGARA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY RAMANAGARA COURT COMPLEX, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 2. THE RETURNING OFFICER THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION RAMANAGARA COURT COMPLEX, RAMANAGARA - 562 159. 3. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION KANAKAPURA Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52892 WP No. 18669 of 2023 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY KANAKAPURA COURT COMPLEX, KANAKAPURA RAMANAGARA - 562117. 4. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION CHANNAPATTANA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHANNAPATTANA COURT COMPLEX, CHANNAPATTANA - 562 160. 5. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION MAGADI REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MAGADI COURT COMPLEX, MAGADI RAMANAGARA - 562 120. 6. THE ADVOCATES ASSOCIATION BANGALORE REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CITY CIVIL COURT COMPLEX, K G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001. 7. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES D.C OFFICE COMPLEX, B M ROAD, RAMANAGARA TOWN, RAMANGARA - 562 159. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR R., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R7; R2, R4 TO R6 ARE RESERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52892 WP No. 18669 of 2023 QUASH THE IMPUGNED PROCEEDINGS OF THE RESPONDENT NO.1 DATED 16/08/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-C. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. It is submitted by Sri. Kiran N., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, that the fresh "calendar of events" was issued by respondent No.7 to conduct election to the respondent No.1 - Association. However, the name of the petitioner has been omitted from the voters list in respect of the next election to be conducted to the Association. Therefore, learned counsel sought for interference of this Court. 3. In this regard, Sri. Anil Kumar R., learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.1 submitted that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous as the "calendar of - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52892 WP No. 18669 of 2023 events" has already been issued for conducting election for the period 2025-2027. 4. In that view of the matter, the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1