Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7306 (GAU)

ON THE DEATH OF JATIN DUTTA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/555/2025 · 2025-02-27

N Unni Krishnan Nair

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010031652022 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Civil)/555/2025 ON THE DEATH OF JATIN DUTTA HIS LEGAL HEIRS ANIMA DUTTA W/O LATE JATIN DUTTA R/O CHABUA MORANKARI GAON CHABUA TOWN P.O. AND P.S.-CHABUA DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM 2: JAHER DUTTA S/O LATE JATIN DUTTA R/O CHABUA MORANKARI GAON CHABUA TOWN P.O. AND P.S.-CHABUA DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM 3: JAYANTA DUTTA S/O LATE JATIN DUTTA R/O CHABUA MORANKARI GAON CHABUA TOWN P.O. AND P.S.-CHABUA DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 Page No.# 2/3 2:THE CHABUA MUNICIPAL BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHABUA MUNICIPAL BOARD CHABUA DIST- DIBRUGARH PIN-786184 3:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHABUA MUNICIPAL BOARD CHABUA DIST- DIBRUGARH PIN-786184 4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIBRUGARH DIST-DIBRUGARH PIN-786001 5:THE CIRCLE OFFICER CHABUA REVENUE CIRCLE CHABUA DIST- DIBRUGARH PIN-786184 ------------ Advocate for : MR BIDYUT BIKASH KAKATI Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR ORDER Date : 28.02.2025 Heard Mr. R Majumdar, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. N. Goswami, learned counsel appearing for all the opposite parties. The connected writ petition being WP(C) 1326/2022 was instituted by one Jatin Dutta (hereinafter, referred to as the original petitioner). During the pendency of the said writ petition, the original petitioner Page No.# 3/3 expired on 13.09.2024. The cause of action in the said writ petition being surviving, the legal heirs of the original petitioner have instituted the present Interlocutory Application praying for substituting them in place of the original petitioner. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and also perused the materials available on record. On a consideration so made and the cause of action in the connected writ petition being surviving, the substitution of the applicants herein as petitioners in the place of the original petitioner is hereby allowed. The applicants herein are to be impleaded as petitioners No. 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. With the above directions, the Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant