DEEPAK KAUSHAL AND 39 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/9242/2025 · 2025-07-09
Manju Rani Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73043 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73043 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:111364 Court No. - 52 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9242 of 2025 Petitioner :- Deepak Kaushal And 39 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashish Pandey,Man Bahadur Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Archana Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Ms. Archana Singh, learned counsel for respondent nos.3 to 7 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents nos. 1 and 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners, who are 40 in number, have approached this Court by means of this writ petition with the prayer to direct the respondent no.3 to transfer the petitioners to the districts of their preferences as opted by them in their respective transfer applications, strictly in accordance with the Government order dated 23.05.2025 and circular dated 05.06.2025 and publication of vacancies. They have moved representations before the competent authority but nothing has been done till date.
Learned counsel for respondent nos. 3 to 7 submits that she has no objection, in case, fresh representations are moved by the petitioners individually before the authorities concerned for redressal of their grievances, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioners, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioners may make fresh applications/representations, individually, ventilating all their grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.3 Secretary, Basic Education Board, U.P., Prayagraj, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.3 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.
Order Date :- 10.7.2025 DS Digitally signed by :- DIGAMBER SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad