Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73038 (ALL)

SUNIL CHANDRA SRIVASTAVA v. ANUP SRIVASTAVA AND ANOTHER

A227/6816/2025 · 2025-07-10

Manish Kumar Nigam

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110928 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6816 of 2025 Petitioner :- Sunil Chandra Srivastava Respondent :- Anup Srivastava And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ritesh Singh,Suresh Singh Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "1-To direct the District Judge, Gorakhpur to decide the stay application 6-C dated 01.01.2025 pending in the Civil Appeal No. 03 of 2025 (Sunil Chandra Srivastava Vs. Anup Srivastava and another) pending in court of District Judge, Gorakhpur, within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C application) in an appeal is pending since 2025 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the District Judge, Gorakhpur to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Nitika Sri. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad