K.K.P.G. COLLEGE AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/9214/2025 · 2025-07-09
Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73032 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110101 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9214 of 2025 Petitioner :- K.K.P.G. College And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shivendera Rajwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J.
1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.3 to take final decision on the petitioner's representation dated 09.04.2025 and 15.04.2025 (Anex. No.6 Page Nos. 46-52) vide which petitioner has sought grant of permission (Anugya) for filling up the vacant class III post in the petitioner institution. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing and commanding the respondent no.3 to grant permission(Anugya) for filling up the vacant post in the institution as detailed in paragraph no.8 of the writ petition."
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.3 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner.
3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.
4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record.
5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf
of the petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioners is hereby directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.3, Regional Higher Education Officer, Kanpur Region, Kanpur within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.3 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation.
6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.)
Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad