Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73027 (PNJ)

VANEET KHANNA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/33847/2025 · 2025-09-04

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-33847-2025 (O & M) ::1:: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (212) CRM-M-33847-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 04.09.2025 Vaneet Khanna and anr. …... Petitioners V/s State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Harkanwar Jeet Singh, AAG, Punjab. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The petitioners seek the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 in a case bearing FIR No.32 dated 06.06.2024 under Sections 447, 427, 379, 506, 34 IPC (Section 380, 148, 149 IPC added and Section 379, 34 IPC deleted) registered at Police Station D-Division, District Police Commissionerate, Amritsar. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 03.07.2025 passed by this Court, the petitioners have joined the investigation. The learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that the petitioners have joined the investigation in terms of the order dated 03.07.2025 and is not required for custodial interrogation. SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.09.04 21:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM-M-33847-2025 (O & M) ::2:: In view of the above, the interim order dated 03.07.2025 is made absolute. However, the petitioners shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and they shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. The petition stands disposed of. September 04, 2025 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2025.09.04 21:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh