Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73013 (KAR)

SRI. VENKATESHAPPA v. SRI. M SHAMANNA

CRP/406/2022 · 2025-11-18

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47610 CRP No. 406 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 406 OF 2022 (EX) BETWEEN: SRI. VENKATESHAPPA S/O DODDAVALA PALLAPPA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/AT BANDEKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE - 562 419. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHANU PRASAD K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. M SHAMANNA S/O LATE SUBBANNAVARA MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS R/AT BANDEKODIGEHALLI VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE - 562 149. 2. SMT. CHAITHRA S W/O S. NAGARAJ D/O M. SHAMANNA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/AT NO.15, 1ST CROSS PRATHISTANA LAYOUT MARGONDANAHALLI K.R. PURAM POST BANGALORE - 560 036. 3. SMT. SUSHMA B S W/O SRI. MANU G D/O M. SHAMANNA Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47610 CRP No. 406 of 2022 AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS R/AT NO.42, SAMPIGEHALLI JAKKUR POST, YELAHANKA BANGALORE - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N. THIMMEGOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3; R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS CRP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 14.07.2022 PASSED IN EX.No.15/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI, C/c IIND ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DEVANAHALLI FOR ENQUIRY ON APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER XXI RULE 97 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC BY THE OBJECTORS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed a memo for withdrawal. The memo reads as under: "The undersigned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above revision petition so as to enable the petitioner to prefer an appeal as against the order passed by the Executing Court, in Ex.No.15/2019 dated 14.07.2022 ad the liberty in this regard may kindly be granted in the interest of justice and equity.” - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:47610 CRP No. 406 of 2022 Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Time spent in this revision petition shall be excluded while computing the limitation in the intended proceedings under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 2 Sl No.: 42