- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:548 RPFC No. 100208 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100208 OF 2023 (-) BETWEEN: BASAVANTAPPA S/O. BASAVANNEPPA TALAWAAR, AGE. 65 YEARS, OCC. NIL, NOW AT R/O.NO.118, HARIJAN ONI, ALADAKATTI-581110 TQ AND DIST. HAVERI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHETAN MUNNOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. MAYAVVA W/O. BASAVANTAPPA, ALIAS BASAPPA TALAWAR ALIAS MADAR, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, R/O. AKKIVALLI, TQ. HANAGAL, DIST. HAVERI. …RESPONDENT THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SEC.19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS AND SET ASIDE ORDER DATED 26.06.2023 PASSED IN CRL.MISC. NO.88/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, HAVERI, BY ALLOWING THE INSTANT PETITION. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: MANJANNA E Digitally signed by MANJANNA E Date: 2025.01.24 13:09:47 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:548 RPFC No. 100208 of 2023 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. In this petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 26.06.2023 in Crl.Misc.No.88/2022 on the file of the Principal Judge, Family Court, Haveri, granting maintenance of Rs.7,000/- p.m. to the petitioner. 3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is not in dispute with regard to the relationship between the parties as the petitioner has married the respondent long ago and in their wedlock three children were born. Taking into account the fact that Crl.Misc.No.46/2020 is filed before the Family Court against the petitioner herein at Hangal and also the petitioner herein has received notice and agreed for compromise however, same has not been materialized and taking into account the fact that the respondent herein is aged about 54 years and not working and has to eke out her livelihood and therefore I am of the view that the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:548 RPFC No. 100208 of 2023 Family Court taking into account the factual aspects has granted maintenance of Rs.7,000/- p.m. which appears to be just and proper and does not call for any interference in this petition. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SH CT:ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4