Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7301 (CHH)

AMIT KUMAR BHATPAHRI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/443/2025 · 2025-02-04

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:6230-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 443 of 2025 1 - Amit Kumar Bhatpahri S/o Ashok Kumar Bhatpahri, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village- Junvani, Police Station Gidgpuri, District- Baloda- Bazar (C.G.) 2 - Ashok Kumar Bhatpari S/o Late Choturam Bhatpahri, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Village- Junvani, Police Station Gidgpuri, District- Baloda- Bazar (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Kalabai Bhatpahri W/o Ashok Kumar Bhatpahri, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Village- Junvani, Police Station Gidgpuri, District- Baloda- Bazar (C.G.) 4 - Rohit Bhatpahri S/o Ashok Kumar Bhatpahri, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village- Junvani, Police Station Gidgpuri, District- Baloda-Bazar (C.G.) 5 - Roman Bhatpahri S/o Ashok Kumar Bhatpahri, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village- Junvani, Police Station Gidgpuri, District- Baloda-Bazar (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Station House Officer, Police Station Gidhpuri, District- Baloda-Bazar (C.G.) 2 - Ranu Bhatpahri W/o Amit Kumar Bhatpahri, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Junvani, Police Station Gidgpuri, District- Baloda-Bazar (C.G.), Presently Residing At Village Gidgpuri, Police Station Gidgpuri, District- Baloda-Bazar (C.G.) ... Respondents Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD AADIL KHAN 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandra, Advocate. For State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 04 -02-2025 1. Heard Mr. Yogesh Kumar Chandra, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Shailendra Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State-respondent. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is therefore respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the petition and quash the first information report bearing crime No.107/2024, final report No.136/2024 of Police Station Gidhpuri, District Balodabazar (C.G) and entire criminal proceedings pending in Criminal Case No.3631/2024 pending before the Court of Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gidhpuri, District Balodabazar (C.G) against the petitioners for the offence punishable under Section 498- A, 323/34 of Indian Penal Code, in the interest of justice.” 3. At the time of hearing, this Court observed that the prayer made in the present petition is defective one as there is no mention of the date of final report. 4. In such a situation, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks 3 permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a duly constituted petition. 5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government SAA, Baloda Bazar, (C.G.). 6. Certified copy, if any, filed in the petition be returned back to the petitioner after retaining its attested true copy. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil