HARSHIT SINGHAL AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/29071/2025 · 2025-09-21
Sanjay Kumar Pachori
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73004 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 73004 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29071 of 2025 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Sri Maha Prasad, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Ashwani Kumar Rai, learned A.G.A. for the State are present. The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the order dated 7.11.2024 passed by C.J.M., Saharanpur, whereby an application under Section 173(4) of B.N.S.S. {Section 156(3) of Cr.P.C.} has been treated as complaint case. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants does not want to press the present application. In view of above, the present application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. Certified copies of the relevant documents be returned to learned counsel for the applicants after retaining a photocopy of the same. September 22, 2025 A.P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Maha Prasad, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Harshit Singhal And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad