Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 73002 (KAR)

SMT SHREYA H J v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CCC/97/2025 · 2025-07-30

C M Joshi

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29271-DB CCC No. 97 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 97 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. SMT SHREYA H J W/O. MR. SHRENAG. C. V. AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS RESIDING AT 'JANAROOPALOKA' K.NO.17/6, KODI-GORAVIGERE MAIN ROAD, KATAMNALLURU VILLAGE BENGALURU-560049 …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. S LAKSHMINARAYANA.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001 PROFORMA RESPONDENT 2. SRI.JAGADISH.G CHAIRMAN AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS DISTRICT CASTE AND INCOME Digitally signed by SUMATHY KANNAN Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29271-DB CCC No. 97 of 2025 VERIFICATION COMMITTEE BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT VASANTHNAGAR BENGALURU-560 001 AND ALSO SRI.JAGADISH.G CHAIRMAN DISTRICT CASTE AND INCOME VERIFICATION COMMITTEE, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT 1ST FLOOR, PODIUM BLOCK, VISHWESWARAIAH TOWER, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001 …ACCUSED (BY SRI. MOHAMMAD JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, BY THE COMPLAINANT, PRAYING TO SECURE THE PRESENCE OF THE ACCUSED PERSONS AND INITIATE APPROPRIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED PERSONS TO PUNISH ACCUSED NO.3 FOR NOT OBEYING THE ORDER DATED 29.11.2024 IN WP NO.24219/2024 PRODUCED AT ANNEXRURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:29271-DB CCC No. 97 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU ,CHIEF JUSTICE and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. VIBHU BAKHRU,CHIEF JUSTICE) 1. The learned counsel for the complainant submits that since the complainant is also intending to file an appeal against the order of which non-compliance was complained, the present complaint may be disposed of, with liberty to the complainant to re-agitate the same, subject to the outcome of Writ Appeal No.364/2025 as well as the cross writ appeal filed by the complainant. 2. The present complaint is disposed of with liberty as aforesaid. Sd/- (VIBHU BAKHRU) CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE KS