Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 730 (UTT)

SAI CHESTHA ENTERPRISES AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMB/5/2025 · 2025-08-07

Alok Mahra, G Narendar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:6937-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. G. NARENDAR AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MR. ALOK MAHRA Writ Petition (M/B) No.5 of 2025 07th August, 2025 Sai Chestha Enterprises and Others ………..Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others ..…….Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Nishant Pande holding brief of Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned counsel for the petitioners. Mr. S.S. Chaudhary, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for respondent nos.5 & 6. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT : (per Mr. G. Narendar C. J.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not giving any instructions in the matter. Hence, he prays that the writ petition may be dismissed for want of instructions. 2. The said submission is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 5 and 6 submits that the subject matter of the present writ petition is already under consideration of this Court in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the safety audit of bridges that are more than 25 years old. 2025:UHC:6937-DB 2 4. This submission is also taken on record. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for want of instructions. (G. NARENDAR, C. J.) (ALOK MAHRA, J.) Dated: 07.08.2025 Mamta