Research › Search › Judgment
Gauhati High Court · body
2025 DAILYLAW 7298 (GAU)
FAYZUL HOQUE MAZUMDER v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS,
I.A.(Civil)/912/2025 · 2025-04-03
Nelson Sailo
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7298 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7298 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/6 GAHC010027632025
2025:GAU-AS:4019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/912/2025 FAYZUL HOQUE MAZUMDER S/O ABDUL KAYUM MAZUMDER, R/O VILL UTTAR KANCHANPUR, PART III, P.O. JANKI BAZAR, DIST. HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. 2: NURUL HODA LASKAR S/O ANCHAR ALI LASKAR R/O DHATIDAHAR P.O AND P.S- PANCHGRAM DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 3: SUDHIR KUMAR DAS S/O SUSHANTA KUMAR DAS R/O- VILL- UTTAR KANCHANPUR PART-II P.O- JANKI BAZAR DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 4: KABIR HUSSAIN BARBHUIYA S/O LT. ALIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA R/O. VILL- NEAIRGRAM PART-II P.OSONABARIGHAT PART-I DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. 5: ALI AHMED BARBHUIYA S/O- ULAZZIZD ALI BARBHUIYA R/O. VILL- BHANGAPAR PART-II P.O- BANGARPAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. 6: NURUL HUDA BARBHUIYA
Page No.# 2/6 S/O- FARIJUDDIN BARBHUIYA R/O- VILL- BARKNAGAR PART-II P.O- SAIDPUR MUKAM DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. 7: MOHOSIN ALI LASKAR S/O NAMAR ALI LASKAR R/O- VILL- JHANJARTALI P.O- SONAI DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. 8: RASNA BEGOM MAZZUMDER D/O- MOINUL HAQUE MAZUMDER R/O VILL- ALGAPUR PART-I P.O- ALGAPUR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM 9: RAGUANGNING RONGMEI S/O LT. BABUNANG RONGMEI R/O VILLAGE- NUTAN RAMNAGAR P.O- NUTAN RAMNAGAR P.S- SONAI DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. 10: SUMENDRA BARMAN S/O. MONESWAR BARMAN R/O. VILL- KUMACHERRA P.O- KUMACHERRA DIST-CACHAR ASSAM. 11: NAJMUL HOQUE LASKAR S/O- NAMAR ALI LASKAR R/O- VILL- KAPTANPUR-18 P.O- KAPTANPUR PART-XII DIST- CACHAR ASSAM. 12: MOTIBUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA S/O- KHALIL UDDIN BARBHUIYA R/O VILL- GANIGRAM BURIBALI PT-I P.O- BURIBALI DIST- CACHAR ASSAM. Page No.# 3/6 13: ISLAM UDDIN LASKAR BASHIR UDDIN LASKAR R/O- VILL- CHIPARSANGAM PT-III P.O- CHIPARSANGAM DIST- HAILAKANDI ASSAM. 14: SOHID AHMED LASKAR S/O. ABDUL KARIM LASKAR R/O. VILL- KAJIDARHAR PT-I P.O- SONAI MUKH DIST- CACHAR ASSAM. 15: MOHIBUR RAHMAN S/O. LT- YAKUB ALI R/O. VILL- SILDUBI PART-I. P.O. SILDUBI DIST- CACHAR ASSAM. 16: RAFFI UDDIN LASKAR S/O FAKAR UDDIN LASKAR R/O- NEAIRGRAM PART- I P.O- NEAIRGRAM SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM. 17: PAPPA CHANDA S/O- SUNIL CHANDA R/O- NUTAN BAAR NARSINGPUR PT- II P.O- NARSINGPUR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM. 18: ABDULLAH BARBHUIYA S/O MAHMADUR RAHMAN BARBHUIYA R/O VILL- NIZ FILBARI PT- II P.O FULBARI DIST- CACHAR ASSA
Page No.# 4/6 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS, THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT., GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI 6 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM SOCIAL JUSTIC AND EMPOWERMENT DEPTT.
DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 3:THE CHAIRMAN STATE LEVEL POLICE RECRUITMENT BOARD ASSAM MAHADEVPUR REHABARI GUWAHATI 8 4:THE GAUHATI UNIVERSITY REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR P.O. JALUKBARI GUWAHATI 4 5:THE DIRECTOR SOCIAL WELFARE DEPTT. UZZAN BAZAR GUWAHATI 781001 6:THE COMMISSIONER FOR PRESONS WITH DISABILITIES ASSAM LATAKATA BASISTHA GUWAHATI 29 7:THE DIST. INTERVIEW BOARD HAILAKANDI REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL ALGAPUR COLLEGE P.O. AND P.S. ALGAPUR DIST. HAILAKADI ASSAM 788150 8:THE DIST. INERVIEW BOARD CACHAR REPRESENTED BY HE PRINCIPAL
Page No.# 5/6 CACHAR COLLEGE P.O. AND P.S.SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM 788101 9:THE STATE LEVEL RECRUITMENT COMMISSION GOVT. OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN ASSAM ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF COLLEGE KHANAPARA GUWAHATI 2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R RONGMEI, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO ORDER Date : 04.04.2025
Heard Ms. R. Rongmei, learned counsel for the applicant/ petitioner who submits that by filing this application the applicant seeks impleadment of State Level Recruitment Commission, Government of Assam represented by his Chairman Assam Administrative Staff College, Khanapara, Guwahati-22 as respondent no. 9. She submits that the impleadment of the said Commission is necessary for effective adjudication of the connected writ petition. Since the prayer is not objected to by the learned counsels appearing for the Opposite
Page No.# 6/6 Parties, impleadment of State Level Recruitment Commission is hereby allowed. The I.A. stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant