Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 7298 (AP)

Settupalli Sambaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/4244/2021 · 2025-09-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010072712021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4244/2021 Between: SETTUPALLI SAMBAIAH, S/O. SAIDAIAH, MALE, AGED 54 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DI STRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDELPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRIDHAR TUMMALAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents non investigation of the Crime No.19/2019, dated.07.01.2019, Arundelpet Police Station, Guntur, Guntur District as irregular, arbitrary and unjust as illegal and unjust violative of Article 14, 21 of the Constitution of India, violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to complete the Investigation in Crime No.19/2019, dated.07.01.2019, Arundelpet Police Station, Guntur, Guntur District.” 2 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Sridhar Tummalapudi, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:16.09.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.4244 of 2021 Dt.16.09.2025 Dinesh