Serial No. 149 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1058/2025 CM(2762/2025) Gulzar Ahmad Bhat. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Sajad Ashraf, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy. AG for R-1 to 5. CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge. ORDER 07.05.2025 01. After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel satisfied, if the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage by directing the respondent No. 4-Tehsildar, Iddgah, Srinagar, to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner before the respondent No. 2-Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, which has been forwarded to the concerned Patwari, in which report has already been submitted and as on date, the mater is lying before the Tehsildar Iddgah, Srinagar, who has not acted in furtherance of the report which has been furnished by the concerned Patwari, in pursuance to the directions passed by the Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir. 02. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, learned Deputy Advocate General has caused appearance on behalf of Respondents 1 to 5, and is not averse to the disposal of the present petition at this stage or else to the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered in accordance with the rules and as per law occupying the field. 03. Without issuing formal notice in the instant case, the same is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties at its threshold and is accordingly disposed of with the direction to the respondent No. 4-Tehsildar, Iddgah, Srinagar to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner before the respondent No. 2-Divisional Commissioner, Kashmir, pending before the respondent No. 4, in which report has already been submitted by the concerned Patwari, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law, within a period of six weeks, from the date a copy of this Order along with copy of writ petition as also the annexures appended with the writ petition, is made available to the said respondent. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed in the matter, be provided to the petitioner through registered post. 04. Writ petition disposed of along with connected CM in the manner as indicated above. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge SRINAGAR: 07.05.2025 “HAMID” Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 07.05.2025