Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72950 (BOM)

ROHIT ALIAS ANNA ANIL FADTARE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

APEAL/938/2025 · 2025-11-14

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

903-APEAL-938-2025 (CR).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 938 OF 2025 Rohit Alias Anna Anil Fadtare …. Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra And Anr. …. Respondents ----- Mr. Priyal G. Sarda, Advocate for the Appellant. Dr. A. A. Takalkar, A.P.P., for the Respondent – State. Ms. Bhagyashri Mangale, Advocate for Respondent No.2. ----- CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 14th NOVEMBER, 2025. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Appellant and learned APP for the Respondent – State. 2. By this appeal, the Appellant is seeking relaxation of condition on the ground that delivery of his wife. 3. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the Appellant and learned APP, I pass following order: ORDER i. The appeal is allowed. Shantanu S. Dhudum 1/2 SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date: 2025.11.14 17:28:29 +0530 903-APEAL-938-2025 (CR).doc ii. The Appellant is permitted to enter in Mohol Taluka only for fifteen days from today. iii. The Appellant shall not contact with the prosecution witnesses. 4. In the aforesaid terms, the appeal is allowed and disposed off. ( SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) Shantanu S. Dhudum 2/2