Bolisetty Santharam v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary,
WP/30169/2014 · 2025-10-12
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7295 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7295 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010072242014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 30169/2014 Between:
1. BOLISETTY SANTHARAM, S/O. B.PRABHAT KUMAR, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. D.NO.11-2-16, DASAPALLA HILLS, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD.
2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER,
3. THE CHIEF CITY PLANNER TOWN PLANNING, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VISAKHAPATNAM.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P VEERRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC)
2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
2
The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is challenging the action of the 2nd respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioner for grant of permission for construction of a commercial building in Sy. Nos.2/13, 15 and 16 of Gajuwaka Village and Mandal, Visakhapatnam.
2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the GVMC, upon written instructions, submits that the respondent authorities have duly considered the building permission application of the petitioner and granted permission vide building permit order dated 09.12.2024. It is stated in the written instructions that the construction has been completed.
3. Considering the instructions of the learned Standing Counsel for GVMC, the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondents.
4. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed off, leaving it open for the petitioner to file afresh if aggrieved by any action of the respondent authorities. There shall be no order as to costs. [
5. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 13.10.2025 PNS