Paidi Venkataramana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/4367/2021 · 2025-03-18
Sumathi Jagadam
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7293 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7293 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010072472021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 4367/2021 Between: Paidi Venkataramana ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. Dr MAJJI SURI BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES The Court made the following order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous and hence, prayed to dismiss the writ petition.
In view of the said representation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date : 18.03.2025 SPP
2
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO.4367 of 2021
Date : 18.03.2025
SPP