Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:118591-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1085 of 2025 Petitioner :- Atul Chandra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Lal Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J. 1. Heard Shri Vineet Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has sought for a suitable direction to the respondent authority to decide the case of the petitioner within stipulated time. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation pertains to matters affecting the petitioner's legal rights and interests, and that the authority is under a statutory as well as constitutional obligation to consider and decide such representation within a stipulated time. He further submits that the inaction on the part of the respondent amounts to denial of fair administrative consideration. 4. Learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents does not dispute the pendency of the representation. However, he submit that the same shall be considered in accordance with law. 5. Having regard to the nature of the relief sought, and considering that the prayer is confined to expeditious disposal of the pending representation, this Court finds it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition without entering into the merits of the case. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the competent respondent authority to decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, keeping in view the judgment and order passed by this Court in Writ-C No. 17251 of 2025, dated 08.07.2025. Order Date :- 21.7.2025 A. Tripathi Digitally signed by :- AKHILESH TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad