Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72914 (KAR)

MR ANUP KUMAR MISHRA v. SMT PUJA MISHRA

CRL.P/2338/2022 · 2025-08-06

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30886 CRL.P No. 2338 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 2338 OF 2022 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: MR ANUP KUMAR MISHRA AGED 36 YEARS S/O SRI ASHOK KUMAR MISHRA R/AT NO 204, SLV ANVESHANA 19TH MAIN, 36TH CROSS, HBR 5TH BLOCK BENGALURU-560043 …PETITIONER (BY SRI.KISHAN DUTT KALASKAR, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. SMT PUJA MISHRA AGED 32 YEARS D/O MR CHITTARANJAN MISHRA R/AT C-2, VARUN RESIDENCY BEHIND LIC BUILDING PRADHANAPADA P O, BUDHARAJA DIST SAMBALPUR, ODISHA-768004 PRESENTLY RESIDING CARE OF SRI ABHISHEK MISHRA FLAT 205, VISHNU ENCLAVES NEAR KUNDANAHALLI GATE THUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560066 Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30886 CRL.P No. 2338 of 2022 2. MASTER ADISH KUMAR MISHRA S/O SRI ANUP KUMAR MISHRA SINCE MINOR REP BY MOTHER AND GUARDIAN SMT PUJA MISHRA PRESENTLY R/O CARE OF SRI ABHISHEK MISHRA FLAT NO 205, VISHNU ENCLAVES NEAR KUNDANAHALLI GATE THUBARAHALLI, BENGALURU-560066 …RESPONDENTS (NIL) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH AND SET ASIDE OR MODIFY THE INTERIM ORDERS PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 DATED 29.12.2021 IN CRL.MISC.NO.13/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE THIRD ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL FAMILY COURT BENGALURU PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2022. 4. Vide order dated 24.07.2025, as a last chance, a week's time was granted to comply with the office - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30886 CRL.P No. 2338 of 2022 objections, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, office objections have not been complied with. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1