Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 72909 (PNJ)

BINTU v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/6958/2025 · 2025-07-02

Anupinder Singh Grewal, Deepak Manchanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. 111 CRWP-6958-2025. Date of Decision: 02.07.2025. Bintu ....Petitioner. VERSUS State of Haryana and others ....Respondents. *** CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA --- Present: Mr. Balraj Singh Dhull, Advocate and Mr. Pardeep Dhull, Advocate for the petitioner. **** ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (Oral) The petitioner is seeking a direction to the respondents to extend his parole for a period of 45 days. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was granted parole for a period of 35 days. The petitioner was released on parole on 28.05.2025 and has to surrender on 03.07.2025. The petitioner is suffering from Nasal Sinus ailment and had been operated upon on 01.07.2025, therefore, it would be difficult for him to immediately surrender and the period of parole may be extended. He has produced copy of the medical certificate in this regard, which is taken on record and a copy thereof has been furnished to learned counsel for the State. 3. Learned State counsel, upon instructions from Inspector Ram Niwas, Station House Officer, Police Station Kalayat, District Kaithal, submits that the petitioner has been indeed operated upon on 01.07.2025. JITENDER 2025.07.02 17:07 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC CRWP-6958-2025 -2- 4. The petitioner is stated to have been convicted in FIR No.190 dated 14.08.2017 under Sections 302, 201 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act, Police Station Kalayat, District Kaithal, and was sentenced to life imprisonment. The petitioner is stated to have undergone an actual sentence of over 06 years and 05 months and has been granted parole for a period of 35 days in view of his ailment. The petitioner has been operated upon on 01.07.2025 and, therefore, it would be in the interest of justice, if the period of parole is extended. 5. In the aforenoted facts and circumstances, we are of the considered view that it would be appropriate to extend the period of parole of the petitioner by 30 days. The petitioner shall now surrender before the concerned jail authorities on or before 02.08.2025. 6. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 02.07.2025 jitender Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/ No Whether Reportable : Yes/ No JITENDER 2025.07.02 17:07 I attest to the accuracy of this document PHHC