HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29446 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sushil Kumar Shukla, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.18 of 2025, under Sections 3(5), 318(4), 338, 336(2), 340(2) B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 6 of Indian Wireless Telegraph Act, Sections 4, 20, 21 and 25 Indian Telegraph Act and Section 66-C and 66-D of Information Technology Act, Police Station-Cyber Crime, District-Muzaffarnagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. There is no compliance of Section 105 BNSS. The allegations are per se false and the false recovery has been foisted on the applicant. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 06.06.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhanshu Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Saddam Hussain .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) 7. Let the applicant-Saddam Hussain, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 11, 2025 Karan BAIL No. 29446 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad