SRI PRAVEEN ARUN CHOWGULE v. STATE BY MALPE POLICE STATION
CRL.P/3381/2024 · 2025-12-01
Shivashankar Amarannavar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72904 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 72904 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49748 CRL.P No. 3381 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3381 OF 2024 (407(Cr.PC) / 447(BNSS)-) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI PRAVEEN ARUN CHOWGULE S/O ARUN CHOWGULE AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/OF FEMILIA RESIDENT BEJAI, MANGALURU 575 004 PRESENTLY IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY IN BANGALORE CENTRAL PRISON AT PARAPPANA AGRAHARA BANGALORE - 560068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NARASIMHA RAJESH K S.,ADVOCATE (ABSENT)
AND:
1.
2.
STATE BY MALPE POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY HIGH COURT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE 560001
AIFA, D/O AYUB HUSSAIN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, #136-G, THRUPTHI LAYOUT ASHWATHKATTE, KELARKALABETTU UDUPI - 576105.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B PUSHPALATHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1, SRI MUZAFFAR AHMED, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYANA MURTHY RAJASHRI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49748 CRL.P No. 3381 of 2024
THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 407 CR.P.C BY PRAYING TO WITHDRAW THE CASE IN S.C.NO.06/2024 PENDING ON THE FILE OF HONBLE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT UDUPI UNDER SECTIONS 449, 302, 307, 324, 201 OF IPC AND MADE OVER THE SAME TO REGISTERED MALPE P.S., ULDUPI DISTRICT, ANY CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT AT BENGALURU FOR DISPOSAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR
ORAL ORDER The notice issued to the petitioner has been served on him personally through Jailor, Central Prison, Bengaluru, on 31.10.2025.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has already filed a memo of retirement. In spite of service of notice, the petitioner has not engaged any other counsel to represent him. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Hence the petition is dismissed for non-constitution.
Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 35