W.P.No.24892 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.07.2025 CORAM : THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.24892 of 2025 Indhiraraju S/o Ramasamy .. Petitioner vs 1. The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai Nungambakkam, Chennai 2. The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department No.12, New Commercial Complex Palladam Road, Tiruppur 3. The Executive Officer/Thakkar Arulmigu Mariamman Thirukoil Pollachi Road, Udumalpet Tiruppur .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to consider ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24892 of 2025 the petitioner's representation dated 10.06.2025, thereby implement the order passed by 2nd respondent in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.No.10775/2023/A1 dated 08.10.2024, within a time frame that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. For Petitioner :: Mr.C.Iyyapparaj For Respondents :: Mr.S.Ravichandran Additional Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a mandamus directing the respondents to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 10.06.2025, wherein the petitioner is seeking for implementing the order passed by the second respondent dated 08.10.2024, appointing the third respondent to administer and manage the temple. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing today, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents produced the written instructions received from the third respondent. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24892 of 2025 3. On going through the same, it is seen that the order passed by the second respondent has already been implemented and the third respondent claims to be in administration of the temple. 4. The learned counsel for petitioner submitted that till date, the third respondent has not taken charge of the temple and the existing trustee is continuing to take control of the temple. 5. In the considered view of this Court, an order has already been passed by the second respondent appointing the third respondent to function as the Executive Officer. The written instructions received from the third respondent also show that the said order has been acted upon. Steps are being taken to inform the trustee to handover the charge to the third respondent and till date, the third respondent is not able to effectively take control over the administration of the temple. Hence, there shall be a direction to the third respondent to ensure that the second respondent's order is properly implemented and the third respondent shall take over the administration and control of the temple. ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24892 of 2025 6. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs. Index : yes/no 08.07.2025 Neutral citation : yes/no ss To 1. The Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department No.119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034 2. The Joint Commissioner Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department No.12, New Commercial Complex Palladam Road, Tiruppur 3. The Executive Officer/Thakkar Arulmigu Mariamman Thirukoil Pollachi Road, Udumalpet Tiruppur ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.24892 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH,J. ss W.P.No.24892 of 2025 08.07.2025 ____________ https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis