Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:110056 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 21640 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vansthali Samiti Khadpathar Murdhawan And Another Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents particularly the District Magistrate, Sonebhadra to take cognizance with suitable punitive action in accordance with law against the concerned Naib Tahsildar/Tahsildar, Duddhi, Sonebhadra and the alleged Manager Sri Yashwant Singh/respondent no.6 for their willful collusion in illegally mutating the name of respondent no.6 as allege Manager of Radhika Memorial Trust Khadpathar Murdhawan, Sonebhadra in place of society Vanasthali Samiti through its Manager pursuant to a void sale deeds dated 08.01.2013. ii. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to make any interference in the peaceful functioning of the society Vansthali Samiti and its training institution run by it pursuant to the alleged void sale deeds dated 08.01.2013 and the consequent void mutation orders." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners without entering into merits of the case, made an innocuous prayer that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merits, but has not opposed the innocuous prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, Sri Dhirendra Pratap Singh, learned Standing Counsel appeared on advance accepted notice on behalf of the State-respondents, perused the contents made in the writ petition and the documents on record. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. Learned counsel for the petitioners is hereby directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2, District Magistrate, Sonebhadra within 10 days from the date of production of certified copy of this order. After receiving the said representation, respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. . (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Atul Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad