LT. COL. SHANJIT SINGH BHULLAR v. RAJESH KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER
COCP/5678/2025 · 2026-05-29
Sudeepti Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7288 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 7288 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
COCP-5678-2025 (O&M) -1- 106 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5678-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Lt. Col. Shanjit Singh Bhullar (Retired) ......Petitioner Vs. Sh. Rajesh Kumar Singh, IAS and another ......Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present : Mr. Apanjyot Singh Virk, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Geeta Singhwal, Senior Panel Counsel, for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA
J. (ORAL)
1. The present contempt petition has been filed for deliberate and intentional disobedience of order dated 21.08.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-13538-2025.
2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had contended that an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- had been debited from the account of the petitioner and time was sought by learned counsel for the respondents to verify the same.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents, upon verification, submits that the said amount had been debited due to a lapse on the part of the bank and an amount of Rs.6,30,566/- has now been credited in the account of the VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.29 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
COCP-5678-2025 (O&M) -2- petitioner.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the same.
5. In view of the above, since order dated 21.08.2025 passed by this Court in CWP-13538-2025, has been complied with, therefore, the present contempt is purged and rule stands discharged.
6. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA)
JUDGE 29.05.2026 Virender
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes
Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2026.05.29 18:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document